Hello,
I think I've reached a good point to start applying changes to the
terragear repo. I can either start issuing merge requests, or, given
access, apply changes on a dev branch.
Which method is preferred by the terragear maintainers?
A couple other questions about future development.
1) The 850 parser is almost a complete re-write of genapt, and does not
understand the 810 format. Would it be better to replace the old parser,
or add a new one alongside it?
progress was maintained on this forum thread :
http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13240
2) fgfs-construct is not a complete rewrite, but is missing some
functionality (like --cover for bringing in raster data). It almost looks
like there should be two constructs - one for generating polys based on
raster data, and one for reading the polygons from ogr-decode.
progress is being maintained on this forum thread :
http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=14478
Any thoughts?
Pete
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
