On Thursday 08 December 2011 07:07:58 Geoff McLane wrote: > I guess the only thing is concerning 'closed' > airports. Should they be in apt.dat at all? > > But if they are retained for 'historic', or > other purposes, it would be good if they were > all consistent...
Just because an airport is 'closed' does not mean the runways no longer exist... The Gimli Glider incident comes to mind. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider. Even if the runways are removed and built over, often outlines are visible from the air for years after the airport is removed. See http://www.airfields-freeman.com/ for some examples. Ron ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
