On Thursday 05 July 2012 07:50:20 Michael wrote: > Everything on GPL only means: > - less scenery and airplanes included ( wasn't there recently some > photoscenery rejected because of the GPL?)
There are already 565 airplanes to choose from in git (all licensed GPL). More than enough for me, if you ask. > - authors lose copyrights You obviously don't know anything about copyright law. > - only to find their work rebranded and sold for ex. as flightprosim etc. So instead, you want to have countless unusable models because their authors lost interest and they are no more compatible with the current FlightGear version and nobody being able to fix this because the license doens't permit? How exactly would this be better than having 565 airplanes already with more coming all the time? > Having only the code on GPL and everything else as freeware...seems less > narrow minded to me. All advanced airplane models contain code (Nasal). So you're arguing for using GPL for models as well. Ok. Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
