On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 01:41:26 +0200, HB-GRAL wrote in message 
<4ff777a6.5070...@sablonier.ch>:

> Am 05.07.12 18:04, schrieb Curtis Olson:
> 
> >
> >
> > We !!!STRONGLY!!! encourage authors to use the GPL so that we can
> > incorporate their work into the overall project and distribute the
> > work
> 
> http://git.fgx.ch/flightgear/commit/?h=next&id=b14ddd40110e271efcd1416e9bf15d48d99c3123

..this, is a _clarification_. ;o)
diff --git a/package/RedHat/flightgear.spec
b/package/RedHat/flightgear.spec index 6feac43..7c03fc1 100644
--- a/package/RedHat/flightgear.spec
+++ b/package/RedHat/flightgear.spec
@@ -6,17 +6,17 @@ Summary: The FlightGear Flight Simulator
 Name: %{name}
 Version: %{version}
 Release: %{release}
-License: GPL
+License: GPL-2.0

..this clarification is easier to handle in courts than the popular
"GPLv2-and-later", because it sets _one_ set of rules, rather than
"2-or-more" sets of rules.

..the one big advantage of GPLv2(.0) over GPLv3, is it "allows" 
the FG, busybox and Linux kernel code owners to e.g. deny Ubuntu
distribution of FG, busybox and Linux kernel code until Ubuntu 
stops supporting Microsoft's no-Linux-on-UEFI-boot-machines scheme.

..in fact, the GPLv2 "walks away" on violations, and the ban on
distribution, then comes from copyright law, and remains in place,
until _all_ copyright owners agrees to offer the violator, a 
_new_ license to distribute, e.g. FG code under the GPLv2.

..if some "stubborn grumpy old" principled coder fails to respond 
with a "yes" to the violators pleas of mercy, then the violator 
must remove that "stubborn grumpy old" principled coder's code 
from e.g. FG, and distribute only what the violator has been 
allowed to distribute.  Ditto for 2, 3 etc grumpies, who may set 
their own personal conditions as they damned well please, e.g. 
Peace on Earth, UEFI boot specs for all OS'es, Islamic interest 
rates on mortgages, hot kinky women, or FG on the GPLv3. ;o)


..so, all we need, is e.g. an Ubuntu violation of each of FG, 
busybox, Linux kernel, or any other GPLv2 copyright violation,
tip off the owners, so they can take it to the cops, and, report 
it, properly, as _software_piracy_, which is _exactly_ what 
GPLv2 violations, are.  Cops and courts must be told so, so 
they can do the right things about it.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to