On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:30:22 +0800 "Innis Cunningham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok here's the comparison.I have two boxes sitting side by side both have > Windows 98SE.One is a 850 duron with a GF4MX440 64m with 256meg of > main memory running FG 9.5.The other box is a Athalon 2000 with a > FX5200 graphics card and 512 of main memory running FG 9.6. > This test was carried out using the 737 (not wireframe)off 28R at KSFO > at noon with > fog set to default and screen resolution 800X600.On the old box(Duron > 850) frame rate > sitting ready for takeoff 24fps and 70fps flying out to see off of > 28R.On the new box > under same conditions 56fps and 115fps
Doing this with my box (Athlon XP 200+, nVidia GF4 Ti4600) at 1600x1200,
all settings default, I see 52fps sitting on the ground, 86fps once out
over sea. The numbers are *very* view-dependent, however -- switch to
an outside view early in the climb, and change the angle to be towards
the city or back towards the airport, and my numbers drop to the 30s or
even 27 or so.
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
pgpus2VwAAga3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
