my 2 cents worth Ad suffixes to the aircraft file names. A letter followed by a version number.
"a", alpha. It's started but still needs a lot of work. May or maynot be flyable. "b", beta. Flyable with no big problems. May or may not be complete. "s", stable. Flyable all the features that are modeled work with no know major bugs. "v", stable and fairly complete. As an example some-aircraft-s2. A stable aircraft, second release. Later, Paul --- Paul Surgeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does someone have a list of "flyable" aircraft for > FlightGear? > About the only aircraft that handles in a realistic > way is the 172. > > What I would love to see done is all the incomplete > aircraft stripped out of > FlightGear. It leaves a sour taste in one's mouth > when you try all the > aircraft and just get one mess after another. > It would be better if there was only 1 good aircraft > in FlightGear than add a > whole bunch of useless ones that just drag the > reputation and quality of > FlightGear down. > How did most of these aircraft make it into official > releases anyway? > > I know these are some rather hard remarks but I > can't find one decent jet to > fly in FlightGear and it's frustrating. > > Paul > > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
