On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:08:16 +0200, Thomas F�rster wrote: > > Am Mittwoch 27 April 2005 16:42 schrieb Patrick Greenwood: > >> ... > > Yes -- I did specify the --runway and I recall <I'm not at my machine> it > > did put me on the runway, but no closer to one end or the other. So I > > started changing the lon/lat specification and moving the plane around > that > > way. I gave up and went to bed. Then it dawned on me that the latitude > > numbers get <smaller> as you approach the equator! > > > > In the default, the airplane at KSFO is situated right on the runway > > threshold. > > Which is the normal behaviour for all airports. Can you confirm that this > is a > specific problem of KLME. > > > In looking at preferences.xml I can't understand how this was > > accomplished. Is there any other configuration file applicable to the > > default start-up or is everything in preferences.xml? > > I guess the starting locations are calculated from the data in apt.dat.gz. > It > contains the runway center point as well as heading and length. So it > should > be rather trivial to calculate a position near the threshold.
Thank you for the pointer. It sounds like the answer very well may lie on or in the vicinity of apt.dat.gz. I haven't tried a lot of alternate airports but have been plopped right in the middle of KGCN and C74 as well, so that must be the starting point and then offsets somehow calculated from there--perhaps something like this? http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-cvslogs/2004-December/009252.html Pat _________________________________________________ FindLaw - Free Case Law, Jobs, Library, Community http://www.FindLaw.com Get your FREE @JUSTICE.COM email! http://mail.Justice.com _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
