Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: > On June 20, 2005 02:05 am, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: > >>On June 19, 2005 07:50 pm, Josh Babcock wrote: >> >>>Eventually I will probably do the last two no matter what. Along with >>>the B-29 they form the lineage of the Boeing 7X7 line, so I consider all >>>three to be very important aircraft. >> >>Perhaps you should do some commercial airliners of the Boeing 7x7 lineage? >> >>Ampere > > After some thought, I think it will be benificial to FlightGear as a whole if > you can do some touch ups to the current aircrafts before starting a new > project. At the moment, there are way too many aircrafts that are only half > finished, which includes my own. To be more specific, these aircrafts are in > desperate need of a 3D cockpit. If you can raise the status of some of these > aircrafts to early-production level, then they can be burnt onto CD's and > sold, thus becoming another source of funding for FlightGear. > > Just off the topic of my head, the candidates for an update are: 737, 747, > AN-225, the fokkers, MD-11, and the TU-154. I haven't checked other > airliners, but I highly doubt that they are anywhere closed to being done > either. > > Ampere > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d >
Hmm, At various points I have thought about redoing the Harrier model or adding more detail to the Skyhawk. I thought the Harrier FDM was pretty complete, no? I've always been partial to Fokkers too. I'll have to look into those. Josh _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
