On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:12:04 +0200, Erik wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Josh Babcock wrote: > > It doesn't really seem to make sense to release aircraft under the > > GPL as they aren't really source code. If an aircraft were released > > under the Creative Commons license, would it be compatible enough to > > be part of the base package? Or does GPL work fine? > > GPL works fine, since the configuration files (and the AC3D files) are > human readable. If you decide to release your own models under a > less restrictive (say BSD) license there is no problem though. ..before considering any license other than the GPL, evaluate your "other" license against the GPL to see which one provides the best legal protection of your work. ;o) ..chk Groklaw.net to see the GPL and copyright law at work ;o), fsf.org for theory and philosophy etc behind the GPL scheme. ..you will want your new shiny license to beat the rather powerful and litigationproof slam-dunk kinda protection scheme that the GPL and copyright law provides. ;o) ..yes, those fancy lenghty 7 course meals provides a fancy way of playing with food. ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
