Hi Jon I would like to compile such a list so that newbies now exactly the status of each aircraft, however, others here don't think thats neccessary so I will give it a miss.
Regards Shelton. > > As I make my way down the list of so called "Flyable" planes, the only > > real contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - really how many > > Cessna's do we really need?? and the rest - well they are too incomplete > > to fly!! > > > > Quite disappointing in fact. > > You can forget about flying these: > > > > 737 Boeing 737 > > 747 Boeing 747-400 (YASim) > > 747-100 Boeing 747-100 (JSBSim) > > A320 > > > > The others are mostly incomplete - anyone else find this as well? > > > > And pity the Citation - which is possessed. > > Hi, Shelton: > > It's true that some of the aircraft are not well "shaken-down". I'm > heads-down in serious coding, and have been for months. JSBSim is > undergoing a major upgrade. One of the things I really want to do when that > settles down is to evaluate our aircraft models and refine or cull the ones > that don't fly well. Feedback from users is valuable. What really helps the > project, though, is more specific information about what is wrong with a > plane. Is it documentation? What seems wrong about an aircraft? If you > could take a few moments to fill in some details, that would be a valuable > contribution to our efforts. > > Thanks! > > Jon Berndt > Development Coordinator > JSBSim Project > > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
