Le lundi 14 novembre 2005 à 08:21 +1030, George Patterson a écrit : > On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 21:46 +0100, Gerard ROBIN wrote: > > Le dimanche 13 novembre 2005 à 14:26 -0600, Jon Berndt a écrit : > > > > It doesn't do FlightGear any good (and is in fact counter productive) > > > > to > > > > make changes to jsbsim inside Flightgear because all those changes will > > > > simply be overwritten on the next jsbsim update. Was this patch ever > > > > submitted to the jsbsim project? That's where jsbsim patches need to > > > > go. > > > > > > The change has been implemented in "new" JSBSim, for the next release. > > > > > > So, it won't be too long until that change is available for everyone. :-) > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > Good news so the a/c could be offered again by that time ( which time ? > > which FG version...... 1.00 ?) > > > Gerard, > > There's heck of a lot of functionality to be done before version 1.0. > For example, plane to plane "chat" for Multi-Player. The list goes on. > I'd say that there will be another release in 12-18 months time, but it > might be 0.9.10 rather than 1.0.
Hey George, I am not only talking for me, any one who wants to get benefit from the JSBSim 1.00 release working included into Flightgear will have to wait 12-18 months ?????????? The world of fdm JSB a/c being freeze during that period !! (i mean no progress) Is it realistic ? Jon could say better than i can, a specific next FG (0.9.9 "and a half" :-) ) release should be done which include the new JSB, being be the only diff. Advantage best control of integration of a new "module". Sorry to debate of it in the user mailing. > > In the meantime, aircraft which authors think are good enough for use by > the public should still be submitted to be included in the Flightgear > hangar. > > > -- Gerard _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
