Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Quoting Josh Babcock :
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
ts really expensive really quick.
I would vote for trying to keep the signs sized realistically and tell
people they should by a 10240 x 7680 resolution monitor if they want to
read them. :-)
Curt.
Man. I wish I could afford a 10240x7680 monitor. All I can swing is this
tiny 1024x768 screen.
Just save to buy 99 more computers of that kind and network them to arrange a
10x10 grid of monitors ;-)
A while back I ran across a guy who was grouping 3x3 clusters of
computers (i.e. 9 computers) and feeding that video output into some
special hardware that stitched the sources together into one super high
res output, and then fed that to some super high res display device.
Oh, and he was then tiling several of these groups together to build an
immersive display. Don't ask me how though, I'm just a software guy. :-)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson http://www.flightgear.org/~curt
HumanFIRST Program http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text: 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
