Dene wrote:
> Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
>   
>> --- scott wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>>    Thank you all for the reply.  Your responses does help me understand 
>>> the differences.  As I suspected FG is the best.  I have downloaded it 
>>> for use initially on Windows, but really want to run it on SuSE Linux.  
>>> I look forward to using FG and contributing.
>>>     
>>>       
>> Oh yeah, that's another advantage of FG over MSFS - you can run it on
>> anything (with a decent graphics card).
>>
>> Happy Flying!
>>
>> -Stuart
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
> Hi
> People more qualified than me have commented on the technical 
> differences, for me the difference is the community, helpful, obliging 
> and friendly...
> Viva la difference
>
> Regards
> :-D ene
>
>   
PS could you have as much input to your local scenery for free as shown at;
http://203.97.103.206:5907/
without spending money.... and i haven't even published the latest...and 
it's all done in 098a FGFS and FGFS 09.10 scenery...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users

Reply via email to