10.32.4.44 is a valid local interface. That is what makes this all so
confusing... The interface is valid, the port I am exporting with is
free, and because I am running flow-fanout as root, there should not be
any issues with permissions. 

> flow-fanout 10.45.68.38/0/8924 0/0/6301 10.32.4.44/162.48.52.59/6301
(...)
> Aug 10 20:24:25 mopsnftemp flow-fanout[25656]: bind(xmit): Cannot
assign requested address
(...)
> I have been running flow-fanout as root. As for the port already being
> bound to another process, I don't think it is... Running netstat -an
> confirms that there is no other process listening on the port I am
tring
> to use with flow-fanout... I am out of ideas here. I have no clue what
> could be causing this problem.

'man flow-fanout' tells us that 10.32.4.44 'must be a valid local IP
address."

Do you have 10.32.4.44 assigned to a local interface?

Everton

-----Original Message-----
From: Everton da Silva Marques
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:37 AM
To: Wright, Brandt
Cc: Volk,Gregory B; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Flow-tools] Trouble getting flow-fanout to work

On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:22:19AM -0400, Wright, Brandt wrote:
> flow-fanout 10.45.68.38/0/8924 0/0/6301 10.32.4.44/162.48.52.59/6301
(...)
> Aug 10 20:24:25 mopsnftemp flow-fanout[25656]: bind(xmit): Cannot
assign requested address
(...)
> I have been running flow-fanout as root. As for the port already being
> bound to another process, I don't think it is... Running netstat -an
> confirms that there is no other process listening on the port I am
tring
> to use with flow-fanout... I am out of ideas here. I have no clue what
> could be causing this problem.

'man flow-fanout' tells us that 10.32.4.44 'must be a valid local IP
address."

Do you have 10.32.4.44 assigned to a local interface?

Everton
_______________________________________________
Flow-tools mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.splintered.net/mailman/listinfo/flow-tools

Reply via email to