Thanks, definitely useful to have all of this in one spot.

On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:06:13AM -0600, Craig Weinhold wrote:
> I've attached a cheat-sheet (view/print with monospace font).
> 
> There is a little bit of historical context that's useful to understand
> ToS, though. For example, Michael shows that some flows have ToS 2. That
> could either be an antique "min-montetary-cost" host or, more likely,
> a modern ECN-compliant host.
> 
> ECN (RFC 3168) is an emerging issue for traditional netflow collection
> and processing. The jist of ECN is that an intermediary router can,
> after sensing congestion, change the lower two bits of ToS to indicate
> congestion so that the hosts can slow themselves down. It's a L3
> implementation of frame-relay FECN, essentially. Unfortunately, since
> the ToS field changes packet-to-packet and hop-to-hop, it also disrupts
> the traditional netflow 7-tuplet key (protocol, src/dst IP, src/dst port,
> ToS, input interface).
> 
> If you can, exclude ToS as a flow key on your netflow sources. Recent
> cisco IOS versions let you do this with flexible netflow while still
> exporting netflow v5.
> 
> -Craig
> 
> 
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > > Various flow-stat and flow-report output include Type of Service
> > > reports.  I'm finally on a network where we use ToS, and I need to
> > > make sense of the results.
> > > 
> > > Can anyone point me to any documentation on the ToS values flow-tools
> > > reports?  How can I map these results to, say, DSCP?  Here's a snippet
> > > of flow-stat output for reference:
> > 
> > There's no magic here. ToS is the whole 8 bit ToS field. Divide by 4
> > (or right shift 2) to get DSCP, since DSCP is the 6 most significant
> > bits of the ToS field.
> > 
> > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Flow-tools mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.splintered.net/mailman/listinfo/flow-tools
> > 
> **** Pre-1998
> 
> The IPv4 ToS byte was part of the original 1981 definition of Internet 
> Protocol in RFC 791, which specified a 3-bit precedence value and 3-bits of 
> ToS attributes. In the tables below, "tos" values refer to the entire byte. 
> In 1992, RFC 1349 added a fourth ToS attribute. 
> 
>   0x80  0x40  0x20  0x10  0x08  0x04  0x02  0x01
> +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
> |     PRECEDENCE  |    TOS attributes     |  -  |
> +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
> 
>          PRECEDENCE                     TOS attributes
> 
> name            dec tos bin     name              dec tos bin
> network           7 224 111     min-delay           8  16 1000
> internet          6 192 110     max-throughput      4   8 0100
> critical          5 160 101     max-reliability     2   4 0010
> flash-override    4 128 100     min-monetary-cost   1   2 0001
> flash             3  96 011     normal              0   0 0000
> immediate         2  64 010
> priority          1  32 001
> routine           0   0 000
> 
> 
> **** Post-1998 
> 
> RFC 2474 reworked the ToS as a 6-bit Differentiated Services Code Point 
> (DSCP) and, soon after, RFC 3168 allocated the lowest two bits for Error 
> Congestion Notification (ECN, an IP analogy of frame-relay FECN and ATM 
> EFCI). 
> 
>   0x80  0x40  0x20  0x10  0x08  0x04  0x02  0x01
> +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
> |                DSCP               |    ECN    |
> +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
> 
>                         DSCP
> 
> name    dec tos binary      name    dec  tos binary
> AF11    10   40 001010      CS1       8   32 001000
> AF12    12   48 001100      CS2      16   64 010000
> AF13    14   56 001110      CS3      24   96 011000
> AF21    18   72 010010      CS4      32  128 100000
> AF22    20   80 010100      CS5      40  160 101000
> AF23    22   88 010110      CS6      48  192 110000
> AF31    26  104 011010      CS7      56  224 111000 
> AF32    28  112 011100      EF       46  184 101110
> AF33    30  120 011110      default   0    0 000000
> AF41    34  136 100010      
> AF42    36  144 100100      AF = assured forwarding
> AF43    38  152 100110      EF = expedited forwarding
>                             CS = class selector
> 
>    ECN (unrelated to QoS)
>    00   Not-ECT  Not ECN-Capable Transport
>    01   ECT(0)   ECN-Capable Transport 
>    10   ECT(1)   ECN-Capable Transport 
>    11   CE       Congestion Experienced
> 
> **** Notes on interpreting the ToS byte 
> 
> The two definitions are complimentary for the upper 3-bits. This is good, 
> since those three bits are often copied to/from the 3-bit class-of-service 
> (CoS) field of layer-2 802.1p frames and the 3-bit experimental (EXP) field 
> of MPLS frames. Bits 3-5, however, are fairly incompatible..
> 
> Thus, it's important not to oversimplify precedence/DSCP as a simple pecking 
> order. In reality, each unique precedence/DSCP value conveys a packet's 
> requirements for throughput, latency, and packet loss, three traits that are 
> somewhat at odds with each other. And, any value can be assigned to any 
> organizationally-unique purposes. For example,
> 
>     * Packets with precedence 5 and/or DSCP EF are often serviced by priority 
> queues, so they may delay packets with higher precedence/DSCP values.
>     * Within each AF level (e.g., AF2x includes AF21, AF22, and AF23), the 
> higher values indicate a higher tolerance to packet loss. I.e., a congested 
> interface should drop AF22 packets earlier than AF21 packets. In Cisco IOS, 
> this behavior is implemented with DiffServ-complaint WRED ('random-detect 
> dscp' on a class-map).
>     * Any DSCP value under CS6 can be assigned for any 
> organizationally-unique use. For example, Precedence 1/DSCP CS1 is often 
> assigned for use as a less-than-best-effort class called scavenger. To 
> successfully implement the scavenger class, all network devices must agree to 
> treat CS1 traffic worse than Precedence 0/DSCP default. 
> 


-- 
Michael W. Lucas        [email protected]
http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/
Latest book:  Cisco Routers for the Desperate, 2nd Edition
http://www.CiscoRoutersForTheDesperate.com/
_______________________________________________
Flow-tools mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.splintered.net/mailman/listinfo/flow-tools

Reply via email to