DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE.  INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.

[STR New]

Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L1942
Version: 1.3-current


Adding a CHANGES.API file or whatever to maintain the API changes would be
also error prone because we could easily forget to update it, while
updating the main documentation.
This said, it indeed seems to me essential to keep tracks of changes or
even new functionalities, deprecated ones, and so on.
I tend to believe only a fully implemented doxygen documentation could
really help in that field, as doxygen tags can be added on the fly and in
the sources _during_ the modification process to reflect complex doc
changes.
I would be interested to get Matt's opinion on this as he made a huge work
on the fltk1.x documentation.


Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L1942
Version: 1.3-current

_______________________________________________
fltk-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-bugs

Reply via email to