DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2243 Version: 1.3-current ...and yes, the patch is exactly what I described, thanks for converting my report into something useful. Regarding the bool/int issue, I have no objections - other than that bool is of course more clear and perhaps more efficient, but it's probably more important to be consistent with the rest of the code. Regarding passing require_alt as a reference, that's just a habit I have when coding C++. I realize it's more important with more expensive objects performance-wise but I have just adopted that habit as a C++ standard way of coding. It's of no real importance to me. /Andreas Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2243 Version: 1.3-current _______________________________________________ fltk-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-bugs
