DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2504 Version: 1.3-current I agree that this seems like a sensible move, i.e. putting the HAVE_CAIRO macro inside a "fltk namespace" by changing its name to be fltk specific, e.g. FLTK_HAVE_CAIRO. Note that there is also a USE_CAIRO macro that ought to be similarly changed to FLTK_USE_CAIRO (or whatever we agree is the appropriate FL specific naming...) A very quick (and probably wrong!) scan with grep suggests that at least the following files would need to be checked for these macros: ./cairo/Fl_Cairo.cxx ./CMakeLists.txt ./config.h ./configh.cmake.in ./configh.in ./configure ./configure.in ./documentation/Doxybook ./documentation/Doxyfile ./FL/Fl.H ./FL/Fl_Cairo.H ./FL/Fl_Cairo_Window.H ./fluid/CMakeLists.txt ./ide/VisualC2008/*.vcproj ./ide/VisualC2008/config.h ./ide/VisualC2010/*.vcxproj ./ide/VisualC2010/config.h ./README.Cairo.txt ./test/cairo_test.cxx ./test/CMakeLists.txt Though I may have missed a few. We'd need to regenerate the PDF as well, since it also references these macros too. Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2504 Version: 1.3-current _______________________________________________ fltk-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-bugs
