DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2583 Version: 1.3-current I have one semi-related issue that you might want to consider whilst looking at this. If we get the option of different pixel formats, FLTK should be able to inform the application of the most efficient one. That way we can avoid having a pointless conversion stage when not needed. Right now for my application, it gets converted from BGRx to RGBx (what FLTK requires) and then back to BGRx (which the X server wants). One big massive waste of CPU cycles there. :) Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2583 Version: 1.3-current _______________________________________________ fltk-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-bugs
