Maarten de Boer wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> I think a lot of this was fixed in the fltk2.0 osx event handler. It >> calls a function called ReceiveNextEvent() which takes a timeout >> parameter, thus skipping the need to create any kind of timeout objects >> and working much more like the Linux and Windows versions. May be useful >> to back-port some of these fixes. > > Or maybe it would be good for me to make forward-port my code to fltk2.0. > Would you recommend that, or do you think it is better to stick with 1.1? > > What are you using at The Foundry? (for Nuke I suppose?) > > Maarten >
We are using the newest version of fltk 2.0. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
