> Andrew Marlow wrote: > > > [... SWIG details snipped ...]. > > Have you looked at pyFLTK (http://pyfltk.sorceforge.net/)? It also uses > SWIG to generate a wrapper for FLTK, except the outermost layer is > Python. Perhaps you could leverage their interface specification somehow.
I had a look and unfortunately the answer is no. The ".i" files are strewn with all sorts of hacks including lots of stuff that is specific to python. I admire the amount of work that has gone into pyFltk but I think it is a shame that the pyFltk developers had to do it the way they did. I know they had no choice because they are working with the FLTK headers "as is". I think this is why there was so much work involved. I realise now that there is no way there will be a SWIG wrapper for java for version 1 of FLTK. There would be too much work to do it the way pyFltk was done. But I wonder if SWIG can be borne in mind during the FLTK version 2 work? > NOTE: My knowledge of SWIG is quite superficial. It is only sufficient > to develop a strong distaste for the code it generates :) Ahem, quite. -Andrew M _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
