Dejan Lekic wrote: > Rafal, I think You have right, we need something like this. > However, I always had opinion that WM-related code should be separated > into a separate layer. > Long ago, when Mikko, I, Martin, Alexey (the old eFLTK project) and > others discussed this we touched this topic as well. I remember we have > agreed that WM-related functions/classes should go into a separate layer > . Mikko later called it "Window Manager Abstraction Layer" - WMAL. > > IMHO that was a very good idea and I suggest we separate WM code and put > it in x11/wm.cxx, windows/wm.cxx and osx/wm.cxx files. > > Apart from this, I am fine with your code. :) Well done! > > Cheers!
Mhm, indeed such organization can be more clear for future -- Rafał Maj Software developer _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
