Rafal wrote: > Hi, after using FLTK2 for some time, I have following ideas how to overall > improve it; Improve it ? you mean now that it is stable enough and released ? (sorry for the bad joke) Text mode :
> 1) nicer modern C++ Sorry again, but I couldn't care less about this kind of issues, compared to _functional_ issues not solved for years. Also arguing that replacing char* by std::string and so on would make FLTK2 more bug free is a complete mistake, look more at the STRs and tell me how many bugs are due to that : answer = near 0. Bugs are mostly due to the fact that we all ADDED functionalities all the time, instead of FIXING the existing ones ... > 2) better examples The documentation is good and also the examples, Bill made a great job on the doxygen part. > 3) better layout mechanizms? the layout mechanism isn't bad. A realistic roadmap leading to a robust release would be more useful IMHO, then you could try to improve it ; guided by the experience of a real working version. > 4) better OS and misc functions Before doing better, we should have cared more of making these APIs really working. > 5) stronger development team and QA Stronger management and a real ROADMAP would be the key of success here. Fabien _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
