> Rafal wrote: > Fabien, there seems to be some problem with news-group webgate or something? yes I posted them in text mode now, yahoo mail adds tags quite unfortunately. > I like to have modern C++ API just for it - many users (including myself) > will find this to be nicer API. Nicer API is one thing, efficient and robust API is something else. My point here is (lead by experience believe me): don't try anymore to build new features on something as buggy as FLTK2. If you really want to make something for fltk2, try to make it stable and releasable as much as possible first. I started to do that and fixed hundreds of STRs until some team mate decided to changed thousands of buggy lines of code, to 'improve' the lib, that's why I'm a bit sarcastic today. > Roadmap seems to be a good idea. It is the only way to go if finally, fltk2 has a future, which I doubt currently.
Today, I believe fltk2 is a field of experimentation, interesting but hardly usable in a professional context. Sorry to be a bit harsh Rafal, but those old fltk buddies here that followed the FLTK2 development years after years, will certainly understand me. I don't want to unmotivate you but only try to warn you with my own (quite long and painful) experience on this sad subject. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
