On 25.08.2008, at 14:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Having done this, I think there wouldn't be any remaining meaningful > distinction between Widget and Group, and the latter could > be eliminated altogether. That would be a Good Thing (tm), imo.
I have thought about that quite a bit and I am not sure we hould do that. The functionality is quite different. A group *contains* a bunch of other widgets. The label however is strictly connected to a single widget and positioned in relation to the widget, possibly outside of the widget bounds. This is not to say that a widget should not be a group. This can be useful when deriving new combined widget types. It appears to me however that the label should be seperate. Matthias ---- http://robowerk.com/ _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
