+1 Not only, it's convenient to see the body of the code sometimes when commenting, but also it has less side effects: More precisely, when a comment is updated in a header, there are good chances that the deps are greater making more difficult to isolate from why several recompilations happens after an update.
On 7 Sep 2008, at 19:24, Michael Sweet wrote: > > > > The original idea was that the Doxygen comments would stay with the > > code, which (hopefully) would keep them more up-to-date than if they > > were only in the headers... > > Yes - I would say that my (fairly limited) experience of these sort > of things suggests that doc comments are (a little) more likely to > stay in synch with the code, if they are where the work is being done > - usually in the src... > -- > Ian _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
