On 10.09.2008, at 21:20, Yuri wrote:

>>
>>> OK, so I have no problem with using glib with Pango and X11/Cairo,
>>> however glib isn't fast or light or standard outside Linux/Solaris,
>>> so I wouldn't want to make it a dependency on other platforms.  In
>>> particular, glib on Windows still has a lot of issues...
>>
>
> I try build Glib by MSVC compiler about 4 times (last about 2 years  
> ago)
> and unfortunately Glib is not work or not compiled (as i know binary  
> distribution of glib made by Mingw) But there is no Ming64 compiler  
> now. and therefore Glib64 (I don't find them).
>
> But fltk_win64 works well.
>
> Glib (and others Gtk library gtkmm for example) is not light in size.
>
> Fltk has 2 great advantages:
> 1 - it is small
> 2 - works with 64bit MS compiler
>
> I think that fltk no need aditional dependences.

Thanks for the input, Yuri. The idea is abandoned in favor of using  
our own, existing code.

> somtimes i have an idea rewrite FLTK callbacks using sigsc++  
> library :-)

Signaling in general would be a good addition at some point. Knowing  
the community by now, we will probably write that ourselves, ya'know,  
for speed and weight ;-)

Matthias

----
http://robowerk.com/


_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Reply via email to