> the FLTK 1.3 online docs at http://www.fltk.org/doc-1.3/ are the > old html docs. I'm wondering, if it is too early (or just the > right time ?) to replace these with the new doxygen docs. IMHO Not yet, though the number of API commented is already superior than the old one, I'm not keen of making the change now until some fixes are made: - problems in dox files (must be solved first, we can help) - problems in class doc files (some api comments get severe warnings) I'll check and finish that one. > And there are some questions: > > (1) Should the generated docs stay in the docs subdirectory, or > is there a better place ? I believe in that the ideal place would be ./documentation (if we can make sure than this does not conflict with other generations (man, pdf, chm ...)
> (2) Who or what updates the files at the URL above? I have no idea, but AFAIR, Mike and/or Matt could help here. > > (3) Would it be possible to move the new doxygen docs there > or maybe at another URL in a daily snapshot manner? This is less urgent, but should be considered. > > (4) If (3) can be done, would it also be possible that > developers could trigger this job by web access (some > php program that generates the doxygen docs and moves all > files over, if requested). This could be done after > checking in bigger updates ... For sure, Mike or Matt could enlighten us on that point. > Last question: Is it time to purge the old html docs from > FLTK 1.3 svn? If someone needs to compare old and new, then > s/he can either use an old svn version, a local copy, or even > the FLTK 1.1 online docs. I suggest the purge of old html files to happen at the time we are ready for a clean, functional release. We are quite close to that stage, but this should be in our priorities to 'finalize' the work. So again Albrecht, if you need help with dox files, we are here. Fabien _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
