Dejan Lekic wrote: > Sorry guys but I must repeat this question again. We do not have any > document with plans on where the current FLTK is going to so I must ask > here: Is there going to be a fltk:: namespace in the future FLTK or not, > or You plan on sticking to the traditional "Fl_" and "fl_"?
For 1.3 we are sticking with Fl_ and fl_. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw dot com _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
