Duncan said: > I fully agree that it would be easier to discuss if you could see the > LaTeX/PDF document. However, at this moment there are a lot of places > where the HTML used in the *.dox files is a bit more non-standard than > doxygen expects, resulting in LaTeX constructs that LaTeX doesn't like. > So I haven't got a workable PDF just yet. > > If I commit my changes to drawing.dox later this evening, you can see > the links problem in the generated HTML pages. Can you wait 12 hours? NO (smile here) Of course we can wait, and I believe we should also get inspired from what Al commented about the [sub]section dox. tags, this may help to solve you current html links decision problems. As Mike also said, ideally, no html link should be used, provided that we can keep an equivalent set of functionalities in doxygen.
BTW, while you're looking at this link aspect, it would be nice if we could also cross-reference the custom pages with the module pages, like: the Fl event functions discussed in our dox custom page should link to the event module in Modules because it's more detailed and vice-versa because it's good for the user to get the essentials of events in the custom page (which BTW also deals with related enums) while having a look to the Modules event functions. Fabien _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
