> Fabien Costantini wrote: > > Ok done, > > now your original dox history is back ;-) > > Thanks for doing this. I did a short check, > and it seems that everything is okay > now. I'll update my RFC thread that it's obsolete :-) You're welcome, I would like that when you get 5 min, that you add comments as you said about the danger to commit mixed svn add/move operations as you suggested in prev. mails, there's no hurry but it's important so that some other folks don't get the same bad surprise. BTW did you finished your local check ? Is the svn svn copy that you suggested works finally ?
> The only thing that is still strange is that we got an empty "svn:mergeinfo" Feel free to investigate that, I'm curious ; as even if we don't get these back (though we could do it manually with svn ps command i suppose) I'd like to understand why it disapeared as we took back the old svn r6430. Unless the merge info was attached to the directory (documentation) as opposed to 'each' file and now it's in src and svn is confused ? Thanks, Fabien _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
