Hi guys, >- If it's to use XCB on winXX, then, erm, why? It already works >nativley on winXX, so it is not clear what a port to use an >intermediate abstraction layer would add...?
imacarthur.. been thinking if this could possibly be an interesting way to remote win apps to thin clients....admittedly haven't thought it all the way through yet. > Jeetu, I am most likely going to work on XCB support in the FLTK 2. I am > planning to work on it, if none starts by then, in 2009. That sounds great Dejan. I've just evaluating techs right now. I find XCB quite clean in it's design so an integration with FLTK would be interesting imho. Maybe I could give you a hand eventually :) Bye for now On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Dejan Lekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jeetu, I am most likely going to work on XCB support in the FLTK 2. I am > planning to work on it, if none starts by then, in 2009. > _______________________________________________ > fltk-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev > _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
