> matthiasm wrote: > > The current documentation is great, and Erco's improvements make it > > beatiful and consistent. Now if we solve the PDF numbering issue and the > > above mentioned missing utf8 API, we are fine. Fantastic work! > > I'll start the PDF numbering issue ASAP, if nobody else wants to take > this, maybe next weekend? Yes please, that would be nice. > ./.. > I'll see what more short-term ABI issues I can find, anyway. I'll make > a list, as Fabien suggested, and then we can decide what to do now and > what later. Okay? Ok :-) > > > Sorry, I hope I am not offending anyone, especially since I have not > > contributed for quite a while. I would really love to get back to 1.1.10 > > stability. > > You have contributed so much, I think that nobody would feel offended. > And I'm sure we'll see your contributions again when you find the time. > Sometimes, some of us are truly busy for years before they can have the chance to participate again (or have the right to participate) to our toolkit, so no pressure should be made on anyone, though it is clear that I'd love to see matt more often in the commits too :-)
> Meanwhile your comments and opinions are appreciated :-) > > Albrecht Fabien _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
