> I thought about it after my previous proposal: > http://www.fltk.org/newsgroups.php?gfltk.development+v:7318 > and I think the title page would best look like this: > > <html table>: > --------------------------------------------------------------- > [ snip main part ] > --------------------------------------------------------------- > <end of html table> > > \htmlonly > Index Class Index > Function Index > --------------------------------------------------------------- > \endhtmlonly > > I did some experiments with \htmlonly within the table, and > it didn't work. The problematic part is the "Class Index" > and the "Function Index". They link to doxygen'erated > pages (annotated.html and globals_func.html or so). IMHO > these should be excluded from the pdf docs.
I already reorganized the intro page someone, and it almost looks like that. I also question whether it is worth having the generated Class Index and Function Index on this page at all when they are available in the navigation frame on the left or via the tabs at the top of all generated html pages. > There are also some links in the introduction chapters > that refer to (e.g.) "Chapter 3". They would have to be > adjusted, too (they are currently wrong, anyway). > > I found that looking in the pdf file is a good way to > find (bad) external html links, because they are red. One of the next doxygen tasks I had in mind was to go through all of the *.dox files and replace the old HTML anchors and links with doxygen \ref and \anchor as needed. As noted elsewhere, the old HTML links are not relocatable so are useless in the PDF. I also wonder whether we should limit the amount of cross-linking from the *.H and *.cxx files. It's already going to be an effort to go through just the *.dox files in one directory checking them for consistency without including the code sources as well. Cheers D. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
