Greg Ercolano wrote: > Dejan Lekic wrote: >> Greg, it is because Dillo. That is the only reason. Dillo has been >> chosen by small distributions because it is fast and light. It is based >> on FLTK2, so packagers ship FLTK2 together. > > Oh, I get it. > > Dillo is a tight footprint web browser that uses FLTK2, > and so to include the package source for Dillo involves > including the package source for fltk2, and thus comes up > on the packager's radar -- I see.
Funny thing is - Dillo can be compiled statically against FLTK2 so that dependency can be removed. I think they maybe did not do that because of recently discovered licensing issues. We will fix that soon as well. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
