Hi Don,

I'm replying to this old post, because we're just (again) discussing the
removal of forms compatibility from FLTK 1.3 [1].

D. Zimmer wrote:
 > I am in the process of converting an xforms application to use fltk,
 > and as a result, will be coding some of the missing bits not provided
 > by the compatibility header (gl_canvas, fl_XXX_pup() etc.).

[...]

Are you still interested in / using the forms compatibility
headers? What is/was your progress?

Did you finally rewrite your application(s) to "native" FLTK
code?

Albrecht

P.S.: CC to your mail address, because I don't know if you're
currently following fltk.development.

[1] http://www.fltk.org/newsgroups.php?gfltk.development+v:7760

-- 
remove S P A M for mail
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Reply via email to