Am 02.07.2009 10:15 Uhr schrieb "Albrecht Schlosser" unter
<[email protected]>:
> I'd like to have a new FLTK 1.1 release soon, because there are so many bug
> fixes in svn that we should IMHO push a new release.
Yes, very well. Do the version numbers need to be increased internally?
> STR #1986 would probably be difficult to fix, maybe we should postpone this
> one?
Scratch it. Thi is nothing we can solve in 1.1.
> STR #2203 looks like it can be done easily by backporting the fixes in FLTK
> 1.3,
> if the Mac OS specific --post stuff is okay for FLTK 1.1 as well (I think so,
> but I'd appreciate a confirmation). Anybody? If okay, I can do it shortly...
I don't know, but it would probably work better. I will try to take a look
at this asap.
> STR #2138 looks like a user problem, maybe we should close with the
> appropriate
> message...
VC8 anyone?
> STR #2130: I'm not sure what to do, but I'd like to take a look at this. Maybe
> this one can't be fixed completely for 1.1, but ... (?)
If you could take a quick look. That can't be too diffucult to solve?!
> Last question: do we need RC's? According to the CMP [1] this wouldn't be
> necessary, but common practice of the last years was that we had RC's even for
> "patch versions". But we also didn't fix one bug at a time for a new release
> ;-)
Um, yes, I think we should do an RC because that triggers better testing,
especially of the stuff that we just recently fixed. I would not wait too
long for reports to trickle in though. Once we are certain that the version
has not gotten worse, we should finalize.
Great then. Let's kickk it off.
Matthias
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
