Matthias: > FLA_, Fast Light Abstraction (layer) sounds OK to me.
It seems like fla_/FLA_ is the current favorite. Anyone else? Matthias: > I mentioned it before: it would really be nice to be able to use two > rendering HAL's at once. ... So... in other words, FLTK would be rendering to multiple FLA backends simultaneously? This would seem to imply multiple levels of FLA backends. What I mean is, a platform based FLA backend would represent everything but the drawing or graphics, which would be a separate proposition. For example, you would have libfla_x11/libfla_unix or libfla_gdi/libfla_win32. The libfla_x11 would be dedicated to drawing/graphics where as libfla_unix would include all of the other platform specific code. I guess there would be a wrapper level call to select the graphics output backends/devices? This is an interesting idea. It would be similar to the output device concept Roman had mentioned earlier. Note: I understand the monolithic lib build requirement. It's just easier for me to visualize the code structure when I think in terms of separate libs. Thanks, Gerry _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
