> Is the plan to eventually have a plain 'make' at the top level > directory do a 'cd documentation; make html', or will that > always be something where one must manually run it? I thought about this aspect from the beginning and I came with the conclusion that many fltk users don't have Doxygen installed and even less have latex->pdf tool-chain. Not to mentioned it would slowdown a bit the full compilation process.
That said, it might make sense to add the documentation to the makefile but then, what it should do IMHO is detecting if Doxygen is present then if it is, check a configure flags (i.e: with-doxygen-doc) that could be disabled by default. Also, we should have a better dependency check to make sure that the docs would be regenerated each time one source is modified, I'm not sure it's case as for today. At the time I started this final doxygen initiative, I did a simple makefile that Albrecht enhanced (thanks!) but I'm not as sharp as you folks on unix makefiles, so it can probably be greatly enhanced ! Fabien _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
