Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > Matthias Melcher wrote: >> >> Seriously though. If FLTK has stalled completely, I propose that: > > This should read: If FLTK *2* has stalled completely ...
Yes, emphasis on that!
FLTK 1.x remains in active development/support.
It's only FLTK2 that seems to have stalled.
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
