Isaque Galdino wrote: >>> My vote would be +1, >> +1 for fltk-1.3 > +1 for fltk-1.3 too > >> Not sure about fltk.1.1.10, maybe sort of +0.5...? > I don't think we should change it now. It's been a long path until > here with this standard. I don't see why changing it now.
Probably because you didn't read the discussion in fltk.general: <http://www.fltk.org/newsgroups.php?gfltk.general+Q%22Header+include%22> But maybe I should have provided the link in my first posting. It's not a must, but it might lower the probability that someone like the OP in the mentioned thread would have a misspelled header of an earlier install in his build. OTOH, if someone thinks that he needs the symlinks, then he ought to know what he's doing and take care of the consequences himself. Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
