On 01.11.2009, at 09:19, Duncan Gibson wrote: > I'm confused by Matt's "Easy as 1,2,3" article on fltk.general: > http://www.fltk.org/newsgroups.php?gfltk.general+v:29450 > > I'm now almost in a position to be able to give some time to FLTK > again, and continue with the doxygenification of functions, etc. > The question is, where? > > Do I make changes on the 1.3.x branch and let Matt merge them into > his experimental 3.0 branch? Or is 3.0 the new development line? > Or do I apply the same changes to both?
Hi Duncan, sorry if my plan is confusing. I plan to merge 1 and 2 into 3, using what's best in each version, while staying compatible to both previous versions. This means that I take the FLTK2 API and set it on top of the 1.3 core, with a compatibility layer that fully supports FLTK1 software. So far, the initial proof-of-concept worked well enough, but conversion is time consuming. Since everything is done in a new branch, I recommend that you do any changes in 1.3. I will not announce an official 3.0 branch until at least Fluid1 and Fluid2 compile and run without flaws. Matthias _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
