> Emil wrote: > > Hello! > > Is FLTK2 supported? If not, then why? > > The official stance on the various FLTK releases is: > http://fltk.org/articles.php?L825+I0+T+P1+Q > > There was a big thread on the nitty gritty details last summer, > so to prevent a lot of typing from the devs, I'm going to link you to that, > as everyone seemed to chime in (note the subject): > http://fltk.org/newsgroups.php?gfltk.development+T+Q%22ARE+THERE+STILL+ACTIVE%22 > > In short, the folks that started FLTK 2.x development seemed to have just.. > stopped developing.
It may seem stupid but I don't get it, why to give up on such a great API as in FLTK2? What is so great about FLTK 1.3? New widgets? _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
