On 19.04.2010, at 14:48, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: >>> I don't believe that mk_wcwidth.c needs wchar_t at all, nor >> should it >>> include wchar.h either. >> >> Currently it's commented out (#if 0), thus we know that it is not >> needed. > > Though I think that is only because Duncan has wrapped mk_wcwidth inside > fl_wcwidth which does set a "value" for wchar_t.
Yup: "unsigned". q.e.d. ;-) Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
