On 16.12.2010, at 22:52, Matthias Melcher wrote: > > On 16.12.2010, at 18:49, Manolo Gouy wrote: > >> Matt: what's your opinion on this proposal ? > > +1 I think that files should be named correctly and used with as little > trickery as possible. > >> I have tried to understand the general logic of your IDE_SUPPORT >> as fluid plugins. My understanding is that you build a single db with >> fluid --fltkdb >> and then construct Xcode and VisualC project files from it. >> It seems also that Mac OS X-only source files aren't considered by >> the present logic. So, what can we decide ? > > Forget the ide code. It is close to impossible to keep up with changes. > Changing the IDE manually seems a lot quicker... .
PS: the better way to implement this would probably be by embedding the file output into some powerful scripting language. C++ simply sucks at string manipulations... . _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
