I'd like to include info in the examples/README.txt about
how submissions need to be licensed, so that when folks
give us example programs to add to the lib, they know what
license will be applied to the header.

While thinking about this, it occurs to me that example programs
should maybe be licensed differently from the rest of FLTK, due
to how their source code can (and should) be able to be used to
begin a potentially commercial work, without concern for the
GPL/LGPL requirements.

I'm thinking the examples should probably be 'public domain',
to prevent the GPL/LGPL restrictions which require 'derived works'
to be given back to the lib. I can see where pedantic interpretation
of the LGPL could prevent someone from copy/pasting an example
and building a commercial app around that which would then be
subject to legal entanglement of making their commercial
'derivative' work public.

I'd suggest that example programs (and in particular, derived source
code works) should be allowed to be used in commercial work without
a GPL impact.

If so, what would be the best header to use for a public domain work?
I've seen small simple ones, and large ones that include all kinds of
warranty indemnity.
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Reply via email to