Duncan: >> In all of the discussions about the initial level of UTF-8 and >> Unicode support that would be incorporated into FLTK-1.3.x, >> surrogate pairs were one of the things that were deliberately >> excluded. Ironic, no?
Ian: > Were they? I don't recall that. > We claim to be able to handle the whole range up to 0x0010FFFF, > and at least on XFT (and I think Xlib) that was true. > It was *nearly* true on OSX and not true on Win32. > > So I'm only trying to make things consistent. See "Unicode in FLTK" section http://www.fltk.org/doc-1.3/unicode.html but it could be that I documented this based on comments in the code, both FLTK-1.3.x and FLTK-2.x and not just on discussion in the forums. D. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
