> I do not know whether there are other serious fltk2 users. Ben is doing work on fltk2 now, so you need to liaise with him...
> So, I am trying to apply developer status for fltk2 here > again. Yes, I applied multiple times before, but I had never > gotten feedback. Bit of a catch-22 situation: To qualify for dev status you need to have posted a load of fixes to STR's etc., that were approved and accepted. You need to show your work is OK, basically. But since no one has been processing the fltk2 patches (until Ben picked it up recently) it's been hard for anyone to pass that particular exam question... I can only suggest you post fixes for a pile of fltk2 STR's and see how that goes. If Ben can integrate your work into the fltk2 tree, that'll likely get you bumped up to dev status pretty quick. > Meantime, anyone please fix bug STR 2694. (I already have > analysis of the bug there). Again, check with Ben, see what he says. Did you mean #2694 BTW, or some other STR? That (#2694) is raised by "spoony" (is that you?) and Ben's investigation suggests that the analysis is probably wrong, and that the fault is probably not as described in the STR... SELEX Galileo Ltd Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
