On 12/11/11 02:46, Ian MacArthur wrote: > OK, maybe not VT100. Maybe VT220 then? :-)
Ooo, pixels! I actually did render a mandelbrot on a VT220 back in 1986 once.. my first unix program, and it was all rendered with those ESC sequences. Took forever. Shot an animation with a bolex. It was green+white pixels.. fun/crazy times. >> Actually, IMHO it'd work fine for rich text. >> Not sure I can think of a reason why it's worse >> than any other. > > Agreed. The only reason it's worse than any other is that it will (inevitably) > trigger a cascade of "Why did you not use markup <X> for this?" type > questions, > where <X> is one of a number of options. nroff anyone? LOL, I imagine we can add that too (HTML was suggested, and perhaps a good option for the future as well) > This sounds interesting to me. Though I'm not sure if I'd ever use it, > it does seem like a useful feature and might be quite cheap to add... It is pretty cheap, and fast; in my app the reports can be quite large, so speed was important. Doing copy/paste from such an arrangement has the same issues as '@'s though; you have to remove them when reading back data from the widget, so that the ANSI sequences don't end up in e.g. a user's copy/paste operation. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev