On 24.04.2012, at 02:59, Greg Ercolano wrote: > A fascinating thread formed today on a large but private CG > mailing list that branched from a discussion on c++11 > to STL ABI issues that I found quite interesting, as well > as the problems of exposing STL in a lib's API and why that > should be avoided. > > It's a private list, so I don't think it's right to paste verbatim.. > guess I'll have to paraphrase as a reporter would. So this is all > paraphrased by me, sorry for any errors. Complain to my editor ;) > > The thread is still in progress, but I think a bit of what > has transpired so far seems generally agreed on as good info, > and therefore relevant to us. > > It gets interesting wrt STL/ABI at (5) and (6):
Very VERY enlightening! I always had a bad feeling about STL in the API, but this surpasses my fears. The only usable STL container is std::string then, since it does not have a template? _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
